IntelMS for enterprise & large operations

One source of truth for your whole operation.

The same engine that answers a jobsite's drawing questions scales to the enterprise: contracts, policies, SOPs, vendor agreements and compliance records across every department, site and project — answered by email with an exact citation, access-controlled by who's asking, and logged to a complete timeline of record.

Start a pilot See the timeline of record

Grounded & cited · Department- and site-isolated · Sensitivity rings for PII, privilege & confidential data · Drafts by default

IntelMS enterprise intelligence agent surfacing cited answers across departments and sites

Built for more than construction

Where a centralized IntelMS pays off

Any operation where the answer already exists in a document — but finding it, trusting it, and proving it later is the hard part.

🏢

Corporations & enterprise

Contracts, MSAs, NDAs, board materials, policies and compliance documents — answered with citations, and walled off by sensitivity so only authorized people see privileged or confidential content.

Example question"What's our termination-for-convenience notice period in the Acme MSA, and which amendment governs?"

🚚

Logistics & supply chain

Carrier contracts, SLAs, BOLs, customs and compliance docs, and SOPs across sites and lanes. One place to ask "what does the contract actually say" instead of paging three departments.

Example question"What's the detention free-time and demurrage rate in the Pacific carrier agreement, current version?"

🏭

Multi-site operations

Facilities, manufacturing and field operations running the same playbook across many locations — equipment manuals, permits, safety procedures, and per-site records kept current and queryable.

Example question"What's the lockout/tagout procedure for Line 3 at the Kelowna plant, and the latest revision date?"

⚖️

Regulated & professional services

Firms managing client engagements, regulatory filings, and audit trails where every answer must be sourced and defensible — and where exposure of the wrong document is a real risk.

Example question"Which clause in the engagement letter covers scope changes, and was it amended?"

🏗️

Owners & developers

Portfolio owners managing many projects and GCs at once — a centralized record across every job, so the owner's team can ask and get cited answers without chasing each contractor.

Example question"Across all active projects, which change orders are still unapproved past 30 days?"

🔌

Your own trade, scaled

For a growing electrical/LV/AV or specialty contractor: one centralized brain across every job, crew and client — the same trust guarantees, now company-wide instead of one project at a time.

Example question"Which of our active sites are on the 26th-edition code, and which still reference the old set?"

Centralized, not chaotic

One engine. Many tenants. Strict walls.

A centralized IntelMS serves every department, site and project from one system — while keeping each one isolated, and applying sensitivity rings so the right answer reaches the right person and nothing else leaks.

Isolation by construction

Each department, site or project is walled off. The system cannot reference or infer facts from any space other than the one asking.

Sensitivity rings

Layered controls for PII, privileged/legal, and confidential/material non-public information — so financials, contracts and personal data only surface to authorized senders.

Approved-sender control

Per-space allowlists with firm-domain grants and individual revoke. Who can ask — and what they're allowed to see — is governed, not assumed.

The feature that pays for itself at closeout

A complete timeline of record — for easy closeout & airtight disputes

Every question, every answer, every source and revision is logged in order. At the end of a project — or the start of a dispute — you export the whole record as a clean, cited packet. No reconstructing who knew what, when.

Project Record — 1450 Birchwood Commerce Way (export preview)

Apr 18Revision logged — E-series Rev 3 issued for construction · supersedes Rev 2

Apr 22Q&A — "Main service rating?" → 400A, 120/208V · cited E-001, E-401 (Rev 3)

May 02Conflict flagged — spec 28 31 00 vs. E-301 fire-alarm tie-in · escalated to human

May 14Bid leveling — 3 quotes leveled; Coastal gap noted · award deferred to PM

May 27CO logged — CO-07 scope & schedule impact · cited contract §6.2

Why operations and owners love it

A chronological, source-cited record of every decision and answer means closeout is a one-click export — and if a claim arrives, you already hold the defensible timeline. The most common cause of construction disputes is parties failing to understand or comply with contractual obligations; a clear record of what was asked, answered, and cited is the cheapest insurance against that.

$60.1Maverage U.S. construction dispute value (2025)

~12.5 moaverage dispute duration, North America

+43%rise in dispute value since 2021

What the timeline captures

Every event, in order, with its source

The Project Record is built automatically as people use IntelMS — nothing extra to maintain.

🗂️

Questions & answers

Every emailed question and the cited answer returned, time-stamped, with who asked and what they were told.

📌

Sources & revisions

The exact sheet, spec section or document each answer cited, and which revision governed at that moment.

🚩

Flags & escalations

Conflicts detected, superseded revisions caught, and every item escalated to a human instead of guessed.

📊

Bid leveling & decisions

Quote comparisons, scope gaps surfaced, and the human decisions that followed — all on the same timeline.

📤

One-click export

Export the full record as a clean, paginated, cited packet for closeout, audit, insurance or counsel.

🔐

Tamper-evident & access-logged

An append-only record of who asked what, when — defensible because it was captured as it happened, not reconstructed.